Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Daley v. Advance Engineering Co.
as 2:2023cv11215
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daley
Defendant:
Advance Engineering Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Daley v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00203
Petitioner:
Justin Matthew Daley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wadley et al v. Hazel Park School District et al
as 2:2018cv12063
Defendant:
Lynette Daley and Hazel Park School District
Plaintiff:
Serenity Wadley and Kenyette Wadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirschke #384284 v. Daley et al
as 2:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Moses R. Kirschke #384284
Defendant:
Cecil Daley, Patrick Harrington, Unknown Pillions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colvin #192744 et al v. MacLaren et al
as 2:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Colvin #192744, Jr. and George Betts #145197
Defendant:
Duncan MacLaren, Cecil Daley, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes #257050 v. Cebula et al
as 2:2014cv00250
Plaintiff:
Cary Lee Stokes #257050
Defendant:
J. Cebula, L. Olson, C. Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy #159525 v. Adams et al
as 2:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
David Hardy #159525
Defendant:
William Adams, Linda Adams, Unknown Ault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daley et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 2:2013cv10382
Plaintiff:
Timothy Daley and Kelley Daley
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , PHH Mortgage Corporation and Fannie Mae, Successor in Interest or Assigns
Banks v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv10199
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Banks
Defendant:
Trammell, Oparka, Die and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
