Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 187
Glenn Bowles, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff: GLENN BOWLES, KENNETH FRANKS and ROBERT GARDNER
Defendant: GRETCHEN WHITMER and DANA NESSEL
Craighead v. Nessel et al
as 4:2024cv10022
Plaintiff: Mark T. Craighead and Safe Place Transition Center Inc
Defendant: Dana Nessel and Brian W. Heckman
Nessel v. Crossing Vineyards & Winery, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10014
Plaintiff: Dana Nessel
Defendant: Crossing Vineyards & Winery, Inc.
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff: TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Nessel v. Spicy Vines, LLC
as 1:2023cv01280
Plaintiff: Dana Nessel
Defendant: Spicy Vines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
Garrett v. Nessel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv13094
Plaintiff: Larry Dean Garrett
Defendant: Dana Nessel, John Doe, Norene Adams and others
Frost, Jr. v. Nessel
as 1:2023cv01226
Plaintiff: Clifford James Frost, Jr and Clifford James Frost, Jr.
Defendant: Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Right to Life of Michigan et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff: Right to Life of Michigan, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Gina Johnsen and others
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and Jocelyn Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12675
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Williams v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01115
Plaintiff: Rita Williams
Defendant: Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Frank G. Hillary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?