Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
USA v. Danele Morgan
as 20-50049
Defendant / Appellant:
DANELE MORGAN, AKA Anthony, AKA Buckshot, AKA Donnie, AKA Danale Morgan, AKA Danele Roman Morgan, AKA Daneze Morgan, AKA Daniel Morgan, AKA Daniele Ramon Morgan, AKA Danny Morgan, AKA Donny Morgan, AKA Donnie Mugan, AKA Ramone, AKA Shane, AKA David W
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Taylor v. USDC-CASD
as 19-70716
Undetermined:
AVILES, Officer, F. LOPEZ, Officer and DANAL, Officer
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Other:
In re: ROBERT TAYLOR
Crawford v. Best et al
as 1:2018cv04882
Defendant:
Danal Which, Lt. Mr. Givens, C/O Anastacio and others
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William G. Breveard v. Equifax Inc.
as CAC/8:18-cv-00952
Defendant:
Equifax Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
William G. Breveard , Shawn Allen Clawson , Robert Cohen and others
William G. Breveard v. Equifax Inc.
as 8:2018cv00952
Plaintiff:
William G. Breveard, Shawn Allen Clawson, Robert Cohen and others
Defendant:
Does and Equifax Inc.
Taylor v. Paramo et al
as 3:2018cv00942
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo , R. Din , Bracamonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xilidev, Inc. v. Danal, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02799
Plaintiff:
Xilidev, Inc.
Defendant:
Danal, Inc. , Danal Co., LTD. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Montoya v. Chamjock et al
as 1:2011cv01191
Plaintiff:
Arthur E. Montoya
Defendant:
Gatbel N. Chamjock, Joseph G. Fortunato, Beverly Dowis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
