Cases 1 - 10 of 20
MADDOX v. DUNLAP et al
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE MADDOX
Defendant:
DANIEL WAYNE DUNLAP and DCS TRUCKING INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DUNLAP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07274
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LOUIS DUNLAP
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunlap v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02439
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kendall v. Lake County et al
as 1:2017cv01923
Defendant:
Lake County, Cynthia Brooks, Lake County Jail Medical Director and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dorazio v. Coulson et al
as 1:2016cv02187
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Dorazio
Defendant:
Charles E. Coulson , Gianine A. Germano , Daniel A. Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zalokar v. Lake County, Ohio, Lake County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2016cv01795
Defendant:
Lake County Ohio , Lorraine Fende , Daniel A. Dunlap and others
Plaintiff:
Marcia Zalokar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cindric v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2016cv00939
Plaintiff:
Milan Cindric
Defendant:
State of Ohio, John Kasich, Mike DeWine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monroe v. Dunlap et al
as 1:2015cv01944
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Monroe
Defendant:
Sgt. Longbons, Daniel A. Dunlap, B. Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Lake County, Ohio et al
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Donise Carter
Defendant:
Lake County Ohio , Daniel A. Dunlap , Marc J. McNaughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beckham et al v. City of Euclid et al
as 1:2014cv00696
Defendant:
City of Euclid, Ohio, Daniel A Dunlap , Cynthia Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Cachet Beckham and Marcus A. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
