Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Gibralter, LLC et al v. DMS Flowers, LLC et al
as 2:2024at00129
Plaintiff:
Gibralter, LLC and Divinely, Inc
Defendant:
DMS Flowers, LLC, Maria Pantoja, Samantha Andrade and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gibralter, LLC, et al. v. DMS Flowers, LLC, et al.
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Gibralter, LLC and Divinely, Inc
Defendant:
DMS Flowers, LLC, Maria Pantoja, Samantha Andrade and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1103 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1952
Cordova Martinez v. Garland
as 22-642
Petitioner:
JUANA CORDOVA MARTINEZ, JUAN ANTONIO ANDRADE CORDOVA, JULIO RAFAEL SOLORIO ANDRADE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
