Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Morgan v. Colusa County et al
as 2:2024at00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morgan
Defendant:
Colusa County, Joe Garofalo, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Colusa County et al
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morgan
Defendant:
Colusa County, Joe Garofalo, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chen v. Murad
as 4:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
Cheng-Shing (Daniel) Chen
Defendant:
Ferid Murad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zhi Qiang v. Fushimi Group LLC et al
as 1:2015cv06529
Defendant:
Daniel Chen, Shi Yong Chen, Fushimi Group LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Zhang Zhi Qiang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Veggifruit Inc. v. Sun Belt Commodities Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03359
Plaintiff:
Veggifruit Inc.
Defendant:
Sun Belt Commodities Inc., James C Lai and Daniel Chen
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
ZHANG v. HANAMI WESTWOOD, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05772
Plaintiff:
JIAN ZHANG
Defendant:
HANAMI WESTWOOD, INC., HANAMI CRESSKILL, INC., ERIC CHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen v. Holder
as 13-2719
Petitioner:
Huan Chen, AKA Daniel Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Pippins v. KPMG LLP
as 13-889
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rehm, Anna Huang, Brian J. Cogley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Lambert, Jamie Schindler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Kyle Pippins, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
KPMG LLP
Amicus Curiae:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Chen v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 3:2012cv02895
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chen
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp , National Default Servicing Corporation , Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
