Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Coker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv02270
Plaintiff: Daniel Coker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Coker v. USPS Postmaster et al
as 2:2014cv02233
Plaintiff: Daniel Coker
Defendant: USPS Postmaster and Patrick Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. NLRB et al
as 2:2014cv02234
Plaintiff: Daniel Coker
Defendant: NLRB, NPM Hu, Mike Pienta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. Donahoe
as 2:2014cv02042
Plaintiff: Daniel Coker
Defendant: Patrick R Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1401
Don Boyd v. KLLM Transport Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1983
Plaintiff - Appellant: DON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee: KLLM TRANSPORT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, WELLS MARBLE & HURST, PLLC, ROY H. LIDDELL and others
Boyd v. KLLM Transport Services Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv03208
Plaintiff: Don Boyd
Defendant: KLLM Transport Services Inc, Wells Marble & Hurst PLLC, Roy H Liddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02143
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02193
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02242
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Stringer v. Barnett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-60259
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES L STRINGER
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM BARNETT, BARBARA DUNN, JOHN WAITS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?