Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Daniel Gary Esquivel v. Rob St. Andre
as 2:2023cv09946
Petitioner:
Daniel Gary Esquivel
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31196
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GARY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Applegate v. Baines et al
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Defendant:
R. Baines and I. Lopez Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWDEN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Bowden
Defendant:
Acting Comm'r S KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Applegate v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Clark, Deputy Talelemo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applegate v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Respondent:
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Applegate v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv01846
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, Dep. J Croteau, Sgt. B Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applegate v. Mehmedo et al
as 3:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Defendant:
Deputy Mehmedo, Angelina Platas and Sgt. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applegate v. LopezPalacios et al
as 3:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gary Applegate
Defendant:
LopezPalacios, O'Donell, Ouellette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
