Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Ellington, et al. v. Brar, et al.
as 26-3315
Plaintiff:
AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON and MITCHELL D. ELLINGTON
Defendant:
VIKRAM BRAR, ROBERT WADA, BRENDA J. PENNY and others
Ellington, et al. v. Brar, et al.
as 26-1403
Plaintiff:
AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON and MITCHELL D. ELLINGTON
Defendant:
VIKRAM BRAR, ROBERT WADA, DOES and others
Ellington, et al. v. Brar, et al.
as 26-1159
Plaintiff:
AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON and MITCHELL D. ELLINGTON
Defendant:
VIKRAM BRAR, ROBERT WADA, BRENDA J. PENNY and others
Azariah M. Ellington et al v. Vikram Brar et al
as 2:2025cv07317
Plaintiff:
Azariah M. Ellington and Mitchell D. Ellington
Defendant:
Vikram Brar, Robert Wada, Brenda J. Penny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christopher Bennett v. Daniel Juarez et al
as 2:2025cv00930
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Bennett
Defendant:
Daniel Juarez, Michele L Abernathy, William Cecil Price and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Juarez Francisco v. Garland
as 23-556
Petitioner:
DANIEL JUAREZ FRANCISCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juarez v. Sandford et al
as 1:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Novaline Danielle Juarez
Defendant:
Nurse Casey Sandford, Guard Perry and Captain Mitcham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juarez v. Keaton
as 2:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
Daniel Juarez
Defendant:
Zachary Keaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JUAREZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv17979
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE JUAREZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
