Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Juarez v. Hanf et al
as 3:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Hanf and Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Daniel Juarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juarez v. Gettere et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Gettere, Roman, Patricia Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Juarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56426
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JUAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JUAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42452
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JUAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juarez v. Hanf et al
as 3:2020cv00194
Defendant:
Dr. Hanf, Ely State Prison Mailroom Supervisor and Nevada Department of Corrections Medical Director
Plaintiff:
Daniel Juarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juarez v. Ocasio
as 5:2018cv00348
Respondent:
FNU Ocasio
Petitioner:
Daniel Juarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
The Koala v. Pradeep Khosla, et al
as 17-55380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE KOALA, an unincorporated student association
Defendant - Appellee:
PRADEEP KHOSLA, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of California, San Diego, DANIEL JUAREZ, in his official capacity as President of the Associated Students of the University of California, San Diego and JUSTIN PENNISH, in his official capacity as Financial Controller of the Associated Students of the University of California, San Diego
The Koala v. Khosla et al
as 3:2016cv01296
Plaintiff:
The Koala
Defendant:
Pradeep Khosla , Daniel Juarez and Justin Pennish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dean Himbler Aviles v. Daniel Juarez
as 2:2016cv01799
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Defendant:
Magistrate Daniel Juarez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
