Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hale v. Diboll Independent School District et al
as 9:2012cv00110
Defendant:
Trey Wilkerson, Diboll Independent School District, Schman "Faye" Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly L Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00099
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davidson, et al vs City of Fort Worth, et al
as 4:2011cv00713
Plaintiff:
Stacy Davidson , Shannan Zillmer and Tanya Russom
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth and Daniel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillum et al v. Acuity Hospital of Houston, LP et al
as 4:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Annie Gillum , Cynthia Johnson , Sonya Peters and others
Defendant:
Acuity Hospital of Houston, LP , Medical Center Specialty Hospital GP, LLC , Acuity Healthcare, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
USA v. Daniel Lopez
as 10-41214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL LOPEZ
USA v. Daniel Lopez
as 10-41221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL LOPEZ
USA v. Daniel Lopez-Ramirez
as 10-50650
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL LOPEZ-RAMIREZ
USA v. Martinez-Narvaez
as 08-20687
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO MARTINEZ-NARVAEZ, also known as Julio Narvaez Martinez, also known as Pedro Salazar, also known as Daniel Lopez Castillo
Lopez v. McDaniel
as 4:2007cv00012
Petitioner:
Daniel Lopez
Respondent:
Martin McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
