Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Campos v. Zuntag et al
as 1:2015cv03816
Plaintiff:
John S. Campos
Defendant:
Paul A. Capofari, Matthew Dilgen, Esq. Daniel M. Donovan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos v. Zuntag et al
as 1:2015cv01088
Plaintiff:
John S. Campos
Defendant:
Matthew Zuntag, Matthew Dilgen, Stephen J. Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2014cv07160
Defendant:
Bayley Seton Hospital, Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., NYC Health and Hospital Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pantoliano v. City of New York
as 11-3234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Katosh Pantoliano
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Richmond County District Attorney's Office, Mark Palladino, ADA and others
Pantoliano v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03108
Defendant:
Robert Adamo, Virginia Adamo, Daniel M. Donovan, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Katosh Pantoliano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. State of New York et al
as 11-1020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jesus Berrios, as Guardian ad Litem of Vanessa Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, City of New York, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporations and others
Berrios v. State of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02897
Defendant:
Battiste, Aronowsky, and Suchow, Inc., Bayley Seton Hospital, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Berrios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berrios et al v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02236
Plaintiff:
Jesus Berrios and Christopher W. Rivera
Defendant:
The State of New York, New York State Office of Mental Health, Michael Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at01036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
