Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Daniel Nava v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nava
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 20 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Property Damage
ENCINAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2018cv02568
Plaintiff:
SHARON RICH, IRMA BUCK, MARIA ENCINAS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Daniel Nava-Lopez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70016
Petitioner:
DANIEL NAVA-LOPEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Daniel Nava v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2017cv01595
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nava
Daniel Nava-Lopez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71509
Petitioner:
DANIEL NAVA-LOPEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Mitchell v. Nava et al
as 2:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kaci Mitchell
Defendant:
Alvaro Nava and Daniel Nava
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Suzanne Degnen, D.M.D., P.C. v. Free Continuing Education Association, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Degnen, D.M.D., P.C.
Defendant:
Free Continuing Education Association, LLC , Michael Keith McHenry , Daniel Nava and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Leonard Ransom, Jr. v. R. Marquez, et al
as 14-16558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD RANSOM, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. MARQUEZ, Correctional Officer, MIKE MORALES, Correctional Officer, RALPH NUNEZ, Correctional Officer and others
Nava v. Sangamon County Jail et al
as 3:2014cv03090
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nava
Defendant:
Sangamon County Jail, Sangamon County Jail Medical Staff, . Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgar Nava v. Dawn Ceja, et al
as 12-57099
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDGAR DANIEL NAVA, AKA Edgar Nava Cortes, AKA Edgar Daniel Nava-Cortes
Respondent - Appellee:
DAWN CEJA, Acting Warden, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
