Cases 41 - 50 of 212
Liuzzi v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Liuzzi
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ANDERSON, KYLE BABB, KEVIN BANKS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILARSKI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68390
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCOTT HILARSKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Kerr et al
as 2:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Daniel Scott Kerr and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Robert Lindblad v. United States Government, et al
as 21-16754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LINDBLAD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, CIVIL PROCESS CLERK UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
SEC v. Malouf, et al
as 21-1327
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
LEWIS P. MALOUF
Defendant:
JESSE W. ERWIN and DANIEL SCOTT CODDINGTON
TREADWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53619
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCOTT TREADWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Scott
as 21-2224
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Scott
(PS) Hopping et al v. Schell et al
as 2:2021cv01623
Defendant:
Jesiros Bautista, Lorin Edward Schell, Lesliey D. Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hopping, Dianna Hopping-Rais, Nicolas Hopping and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
