Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Frederick Banks v. United Safety Service, et al
as 13-4452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS, AN AMERICAN INDIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Banks v. Butler et al
as 5:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
D. Butler, L. Hunt, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v UNKNOWN
as 2:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
AN UNKNOWN NAMED NUMBER OF US POSTAL INSPECTORS, UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Butler et al
as 1:2013cv02106
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
D. Butler, L. Hunt, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v Unknown
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of US Postal Inspectors, United States Postal Inspection Service, David Anderchak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. At least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the BOP operating from the Special Housing Unit et al
as 1:2013cv02063
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
At least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the BOP operating from the Special Housing Unit, Davenport, Tracie Fenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02062
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents, At Least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the bop operating from the special housing Unit, An Unknown Named Number of Other United States Government Agents and others
Amicu:
Nancy-Ann E. DeParle
Fifth_party_defendant:
Mona K. Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
