Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Christopher Taylor
as 23-1401
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Daniel Taylor
Taylor v. Willis et al
as 1:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Brent Willis, Fred Cooper, Tim Haas and others
Petitioner:
Damian Betebenner, Cigdem Betebenner and Chris Dobson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Daniel Taylor v. Carl Manis
as 21-7442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL MANIS, Warden Wallens Ridge State Prison, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, LESLIE FLEMING, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Defendant:
J. ELY
Daniel Taylor v. California Corral, Inc.
as 8:2021cv01067
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
California Corral, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Oliver Bolotin, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1838
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Clarence Gallinger, Lawanda Drayton, Maurice Saxton and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Daniel Taylor v. Carl Manis
as 21-6418
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, CARL MANIS, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CARBER, Floor Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Daniel Taylor v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6263
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Daniel Taylor v. J. Ely
as 20-7826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ELY
Daniel Taylor v. Leslie Fleming
as 20-7816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMFORD CRAFT, Correctional Officer, HAROLD CLARKE, LESLIE FLEMING, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
