Cases 1 - 10 of 15
USA v. Torres-Diaz
as 22-10939
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carlos Daniel Torres-Diaz
Doe v. Ascension Seton-Luling et al
as 1:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ascension Seton-Luling, Luling Police Department and Officer Daniel Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FILING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ascension Seton-Luling, Luling Police Department and Luling Police Officer Daniel Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Torres v. Lucio et al
as 1:2019cv00039
Defendant:
G Santos, Noe Santibanez, Juan Moya and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bustinza et al v. Lucio et al Do not docket Plaintiff Torres in this case. Case severed into civil case in B19CV39 .
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
G Santos, Noe Santibanez, Juan Moya and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Roel Bustinza and Daniel Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ana Hercules-Quiteno, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60630
Petitioner:
ANA LAURA HERCULES-QUITENO and CHRISTOPHER DANIEL TORRES-HERCULES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Burgdorf v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
as 5:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
Brian W. Burgdorf
Defendant:
Daniel Torres and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
USA v. Daniel Torres-Beltran
as 14-51181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL TORRES-BELTRAN
USA v. Daniel Torres-Beltran
as 14-51185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL TORRES-BELTRAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
