Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Torres Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1004
Petitioner:
SANDRA CAROLINA TORRES MARTINEZ and CARLOS DANIEL MARTINEZ TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Foster v. Somners
as 5:2023cv04985
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Tondee, Daniel Martinez, Kathryn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Martinez v. Catricia Howard
as 22-16988
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD
John Bright v. City of Santa Maria et al
as 2:2022cv08344
Plaintiff:
John Bright
Defendant:
City of Santa Maria, Chief Phil Hansen, Sgt. Jesus Valle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Gutierrez
as 4:2022cv00505
Petitioner:
Daniel Martinez
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanabria-Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1658
Petitioner:
ANA BEATRIZ SANABRIA-DOMINGUEZ, ALDRIN ESTUARDO MARTINEZ-SANABRIA and JOSHUA DANIEL MARTINEZ-SANABRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hasmik Chinaryan, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, Individually and as Guardian as Litem for NEC, a Minor and MARIANA MANUKYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHEL MOORE, Chief of Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
