Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Daniel Jackson v. United States
as 22-3676
Petitioner:
Daniel Louis Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Daniel Jackson v. United States
as 21-3123
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Louis Jackson
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Kansas, State of v. Jackson
as 6:2021cv01149
Defendant:
Daniel J. Jackson
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Danielle Jackson v. US
as 20-6958
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIELLE JERMAINE JACKSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
US v. Daniel Jackson
as 17-6546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL CHRISTOPHER JACKSON
Jackson v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
as 4:2013cv00617
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Jackson
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campbell Harrison & Dagley LLP et al v. Hill
as 3:2010cv02269
Defendant:
Erin Nance Hill and Albert G Hill, III
Plaintiff:
Calloway Norris Burdette & Weber PLLC and Campbell Harrison & Dagley LLP
Intervenor Plaintiff:
PBL Multi-Strategy Fund LP, Law Offices of Stephen F Malouf PC, Charla G. Aldous doing business as Aldous Law Firm and others
Interested Party:
Zurich American Insurance Company and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Petitioner:
Melrose Properties, LLC, THH Properties Limited Partnership, D&B Thompson Investments, LP and others
Counter Defendant:
Stephen F Malouf and Ms. Charla G. Aldous doing business as Aldous Law Firm
Receiver:
Daniel L Jackson
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Intervenor Defendant:
Ahtrey Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
