Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dampeer v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02957
Plaintiff:
Monique Dampeer
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Erleen Banks, Daniel Johnson and others
Johnson v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10843
Plaintiff:
Danielle Johnson
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. WalMart, Inc.
as 1:2023cv07579
Plaintiff:
Danielle Johnson
Defendant:
WALMART INC. and WalMart, Inc. a Foreign Corporation doing business as Walmart Supercenter #2817
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. SHERIFF MADISON COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCOTT MELLINGER, TYLER JUGG, CARPENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aon plc v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Aon plc
Defendant:
Josh Thompson, Daniel Johnson, Annette Nitti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Johnson v Westville Correctional Facility
as 3:2021cv00337
Defendant:
WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. GANT et al
as 2:2020cv00410
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, ADAM LOUDERMILK and JUSTIN GANT
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RUDOLPH ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GRANT et al
as 2:2020cv00389
Defendant:
CODY TIDD, GRANT, TRAVIS CLEMENTS and others
Plaintiff:
BARNARD L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davis
as 1:2019cv04252
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
Barbera A Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
