Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SELDON v. LEE et al
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
DANIEL LEE and JOHN DOE HOPKINS
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SELDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Slaughter v. Auletta
as 1:2017cv01175
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Slaughter
Defendant:
Christopher Auletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00295
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE PAGE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America v. Welteroth et al
as 4:2013cv01038
Plaintiff:
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Karen L. Welteroth and Daniel Lee Winters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MCCLOSKEY v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv01555
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE LEE MCCLOSKEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JAMES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66502
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE JAMES
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66316
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE PARKER, SR.
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. , 3M BUSINESS PRODUCTS SALES, INC., PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGRAW et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv70141
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE MCGRAW and BRENDA H. MCGRAW
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dropik v. Unidentified Representatives of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2008cv00672
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Dropik
Respondent:
Unidentified Representatives of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KASHER v. WESNER et al
as 5:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE KASHER
Defendant:
E. GRANT WESNER, MARK T. ROOMBERG, WILLIAMS F. OCHS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
