Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tournahu et al v. Flynn et al
as 3:2022cv03220
Plaintiff:
Robert Tournahu, Todd Simone, Robert Evans and others
Defendant:
Peggy Flynn, Ken Savano, Tim Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05640
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 4:2017cv04653
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff, Steve Simpkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv03034
Plaintiff:
Dale Joseph Lynch
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Susan Lockhart, Daniel Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McKinney v. Franklin County Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv01044
Plaintiff:
Mary McKinney
Defendant:
Franklin County Illinois, Randall Crocker, Michael Abell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lon Brown v. Daniel Lynch, et al
as 12-30042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LON BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL LYNCH, HENRY WHITEHORN, SR. and CITY OF SHREVEPORT
Lynch v. Miller et al
as 3:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Lynch
Defendant:
Pete Miller, Kimberley Miller, Kim Spilker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
