Cases 1 - 10 of 338
SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Rowlands et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2023cv01567
Petitioner:
Sylvia Rowlands, Phillip Rowlands, Daniel Maier and others
Respondent:
US Army Corps of Engineers, US Maritime Administration Department, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Grinnell et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 8:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
William Grinnell, Frank Sheldon and Daniel Blanchette
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, New York State Department of Health and Town of Ticonderoga, New York
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Clean Water Act - Citizen Suits re Environmental Matters
HEALTHY GULF et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
HEALTHY GULF, BAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant:
LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Interested Party:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
City of Aurora, Illinois v. Get Green Recycling Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03187
Plaintiff:
City of Aurora City of Aurora, Illinois
Defendant:
Get Green Recycling Get Green Recycling Inc., GGR Real Estate, LLC, Get Green Appliance Recycling, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Orutsararmiut Native Council et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Orutsararmiut Native Council, Tuluksak Native Community and Organized Village of Kwethluk
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Donlin Gold LLC
Petitioner:
Calista Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
