Cases 41 - 50 of 17,983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Rodriguez Restaurant Y Cantina, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Rodriguez Restaurant Y Cantina LLC doing business as Rodriguez Restaurant doing business as Rodriguez Restaurant Y Cantina and Daniel Rodriguez doing business as Rodriguez Restaurant doing business as Rodriguez Restaurant Y Cantina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Pearson v. City of New York
as 24-1167
Plaintiff:
LESTER PEARSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DARCEL CLARK, Bronx County District Attorney; In His Personal Capacity and others
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Burmeister v. Peterson, et al.
as 24-2782
Plaintiff:
JEANNETTE BURMEISTER
Defendant:
DANIEL L. PETERSON, M.D., SIERRA INTERNAL MEDICINE and SIMMARON RESEARCH
Lynch v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv03510
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Lynch
Defendant:
Harris & Harris, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hernandez-De Cornejo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2731
Petitioner:
GLADIS ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ-DE CORNEJO, EMELY PAOLA CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ and LIAN DANIEL CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
