Cases 31 - 40 of 7,087
Dixon Jr. et al v. Lammert et al
as 1:2024cv02891
Plaintiff:
Temmy L. Dixon Jr., Cirsten M. Nunn and The City of Chicago
Defendant:
Timothy M. Lammert and Daniel P. Condreva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bernard Mims v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1564
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MIMS
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KENNETH BOUDREAU, RICHARD PECK and others
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Igwe v. Macon County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
Daniel Igwe
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Office, Brad Patient, Joseph Pearcy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2024pq01055
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Tammy R Daniels
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bernard v. Presley et al
as 3:2024cv50134
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Katherine Presley, Amanda Irick, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Danielle E Albert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gregory Perkins v. James Koehler, et al
as 24-1508
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PERKINS
Defendant:
JAMES KOEHLER, DANIEL CUSHING and JOHN KIND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Young v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Young
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Jennifer Chacon, . Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
