Cases 31 - 40 of 1,237
Mackey v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Bakari Mackey
Defendant:
Daniel Henry, Nick Bowles and Andrew Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schatz et al v. Meta Platforms Inc
as 2:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schatz, Mary Pickens, Elizabeth Rosas and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bolden et al v. Robertson et al
as 2:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Coasondra Bolden, Saaron Smith, Monica Barton and others
Defendant:
James Robertson, Meta Platforms Inc and Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
TruTemp Refrigeration & Commercial Climate, LLC v. Mowbray et al
as 1:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
TruTemp Refrigeration & Commercial Climate, LLC
Defendant:
Danielle Mowbray and Amy Suzanne Hadden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2023cv01464
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Daniel v. Alabama Crime Victims Compensation (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Alabama Crime Victims Compensation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Montgomery Police Department (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Empire Properties (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Empire Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
