Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Eaves v. Kory, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DOUGLAS EAVES
Defendant:
MS. KORY, JERRY ROARK, DANNY SALAZAR and others
Zipris v. Janski, et al
as 23-1375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY ZIPRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. JANSKI, Magistrate, Arapahoe County Court, 7325 S. Potomac Street, Centennial, CO 80112 and JOHN E. SCIPIONE, Judge, Arapahoe County District Court, 7325 South Potomac Street, Centennial, CO 80112
Jarvis v. Weston County Detention Center, et al
as 23-8063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CORPORAL JASON JENKINS, in his official capacity, OFFICER LARAMIE, in his official capacity and others
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
Daniels v. USAO UT Dist, et al
as 23-4049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY LYNN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
USAO UT DIST, ANGELA MARIE REDDISH-DAY, UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH and others
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 23-4042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOY ARLAN BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, PETE AGUILAR, COLIN Z. ALLRED and others
Winter, et al v. New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNI LYNN WINTER, SUSAN BRAWNER, SATIOUS MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS and RICKY SERNA, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
United States v. Daniels
as 22-4084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANNY LYNN DANIELS
United States v. Reisman
as 22-7043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANNY RAY REISMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
