Cases 1 - 10 of 78
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hayward v. Peed et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Judge F. Gates Peed, Brian A. Deal and K-9 Sgt. Brian Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ottley v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Dante Jevon Ericson Ottley
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Thomas E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Hayward v. Mundy et al
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Brian Mundy, Deputy Caleb Grovenstein, Judge F. Gates Peed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. Bowman
as 2:2022cv00123
Petitioner:
Gregory Dante Hood
Respondent:
Sheriff William Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Galdamez et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Detective Jose Galdamez, Attorney Dante Hudson, District Attorney Stephen D. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harley v. Isael Gonzalez et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Agape Xpress, Inc., Isael Gonzalez, National Transportation Insurance Company Risk Retention Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bobbie D. Harley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Fredrick v. Green
as 2:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dante G. Fredrick
Defendant:
Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick v. Wiggins et al
as 2:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Investigator Chad Strickland and Chief Jay Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Dante G. Fredrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
