Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Turner v. Dapeer et al
as 3:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Dapeer, Rosenbilt, Litvak LLP Lawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. DAPEER, ROSENBILT, LIVAK LLP LAWYERS et al
as 3:2023cv02378
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
DAPEER, ROSENBILT, LIVAK LLP LAWYERS, BARETT AND FARAHANY, USSOCOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURNER v. DAPEER ROSENBILT LITCAK LLP LAWYERS et al
as 5:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
DAPEER ROSENBILT LITCAK LLP LAWYERS, BARRETT AND FARAHANY, USSOCOM and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Dapeer v. Neutrogena Corp.
as 1:2014cv22113
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dapeer
Defendant:
Neutrogena Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linwood Tracy, Jr., et al v. Tiffany Miles, et al
as 12-16620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINWOOD EDWARD TRACY, Jr., Patriarch, Public Minister, Executive Administrative Officer of World Prayers Answered, a Regligious Order With a Displomatic Corp. and WILLIAM GERALD FILION, Ambassador, Pro Se, Under World Prayers Answered Embassy Mission
Defendant - Appellee:
TIFFANY MILES, NATE TURNER, NICOLE M. HOFFMAN and others
Linwood Tracy, Jr., et al v. Tiffany Miles, et al
as 11-17343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINWOOD EDWARD TRACY, Jr., Patriarch, Public Minister, Executive Administrative Officer of World Prayers Answered, a Regligious Order With a Displomatic Corp. and WILLIAM GERALD FILION, Ambassador, Pro Se, Under World Prayers Answered Embassy Mission
Defendant - Appellee:
TIFFANY MILES, NATE TURNER, NICOLE M. HOFFMAN and others
Tracy et al v. CEO, Successor, et al.,
as 3:2011cv00436
Defendant:
David T. Bristow, Jocelyn Corbett, Dapeer, Rosenbuilt, Litvap, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
William Gerald Filion and Linwood Edward Tracy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
