Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Tripp v. Dooly et al
as 4:2021cv04110
Respondent:
Darin Young, Warden Jackson, Bob Dooly and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thunder v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04099
Respondent:
Darin Young, Douglas Weber, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and others
Petitioner:
Barry Glenn Thunder and Barry Glen Thunder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harcey v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2021cv04071
Defendant:
Myron Rau, Kenneth Albers, Chuck Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Harcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banghart v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04066
Respondent:
Darin Young and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Marty Joe Banghart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Croymans et al
as 1:2021cv01007
Defendant:
Robert W. Dooley, Tim Zempel, City of Sisseton and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Tripp v. Dooley et al
as 4:2021cv04027
Defendant:
Sandra Hanson, Darin Young, Matthew Thelen and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Young et al
as 4:2020cv04195
Defendant:
Warden Darin Young, Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg, Warden Bob Dooley and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piper v. Young et al
as 5:2020cv05074
Respondent:
Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Briley Piper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tripp v. Dooley et al
as 4:2020cv04177
Respondent:
Darin Young, Bob Dooley and Jason Ravnsborg
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kiir v. Young
as 4:2020cv04167
Petitioner:
Diw Bol Kiir
Respondent:
Darin Young and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
