Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dario Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3199
Petitioner:
DARIO GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.755 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00281
Defendant:
Unknown Heirs of Dario Gonzalez, STARR COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR, AMEIDA SALINAS, Rafael Castro Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Gonzalez v. Jouett et al
as 4:2020cv02907
Defendant:
Leroy Jouett and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ruben Dario Gonzalez Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
TORRES et al v. FUTURE SANITATION & RECYCLING et al
as 2:2015cv03532
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL TORRES , ORLANDO REYNOSO , AMERICO CASADO and others
Defendant:
FUTURE SANITATION & RECYCLING, SOUTH EAST PERSONNEL LEASING, BRYAN ALOIA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez-Castro v. Unnamed Respondent
as 1:2013cv03594
Petitioner:
Dario Gonzalez-Castro
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01351
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01339
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Panicia Da Silva, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-12842
Petitioner:
PANICIA DA SILVA, DAVID FAYE DA SILVA and RICARDO DARIO GONZALEZ ALABERN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Derwin Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60135
Petitioner:
DERWIN DARIO GONZALEZ, also known as Derwin Gonzalez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
