Cases 1 - 10 of 41
THOMAS v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2023cv20777
Plaintiff:
DARIUS LECEAN JOSEPH THOMAS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, BECKY SCOTT, MICHAEL DANTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. AVILES et al
as 2:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
DARIUS THOMAS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OSCAR AVILES, WIENT and MICHAEL DANTICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGES v. ADMINISTRATOR, N.J. STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv01594
Petitioner:
DARIUS BRIDGES
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR, N.J. STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMUELS v. LONGNECKER ET AL
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
DARIUS SAMUELS
Defendant:
DR. LONGNECKER, P.A. STROUP and NP KNEISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK STEVENSON et al v. THE COUNTY OF SALEM et al
as 1:2022cv02138
Plaintiff:
MRS DANA STEVENSON, DANA CLARK STEVENSON, MARK HENDRICKS and others
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY, THE COUNTY OF SALEM, JOHN S. CUZZUPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DOE et al.
as 3:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIUTENANT JANE DOE, SEGREGATION OFFICER SALYARD, MEDICAL PROVIDER GAUDET, D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. WARDEN-FDC PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2021cv03286
Petitioner:
DARIUS CARTER
Respondent:
WARDEN-FDC PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Willliams v. Finley
as 1:2021cv00231
Respondent:
Scott Finley
Petitioner:
Darius J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
