Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Matthews v. Escambia County Alabama Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Darius Matthews
Defendant:
Escambia County Alabama Drug Task Force and Det. Lt Talik Stables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLETON v. MOODY
as 4:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
DARIUS T MIDDLETON
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith, Mrs. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheridan v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Darius Sheridan
Defendant:
Blake Turman and Thomas Hugghins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Lotti et al
as 1:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Wright
Defendant:
Vincent A. Lotti, Darius Pattilo, Sabriya H. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Thomas
as 6:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Darius Tucker
Defendant:
Dr. Dilip Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Simmons et al
as 2:2022cv14249
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Jake Simmons, Darius Gibson, Veronica Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dario Michael Rodriguez v. Kathy Serrano, et al
as 22-11755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIO M. RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. David a.k.a. Darius a.k.a. Mario
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHY SERRANO, Supervisor, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER and LEELYN ACQUINO, Operation Director
Emory v. Thomas
as 3:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Darius Emory and Darious Emory
Defendant:
Karen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. TOBY
as 1:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
Annette Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
