Cases 21 - 30 of 41
ROBINSON v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06716
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv04926
Petitioner:
DARIUS JACKSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darius Flewellen v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 15-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARIUS FLEWELLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MCDOWELL v. JESSIE et al
as 2:2014cv07311
Plaintiff:
DARIUS DWIGHT MCDOWELL
Defendant:
JESSIE, PHILLIP, VARGAUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. NOGAM et al
as 2:2014cv04268
Petitioner:
DARIUS MURPHY
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAM and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Wood v. Elizabeth Hogan, et al
as 14-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HOGAN, JENNA CACCESE, RICCARDO GRIPPALDI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DARIUS CHACINSKI
George v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2014cv00633
Petitioner:
Darius George
Respondent:
John Kerestes, Commonwealth of PA, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLEWELLEN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2013cv07399
Petitioner:
DARIUS FLEWELLEN
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anant Tripati v. Mark Hale, et al
as 13-3567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK W. HALE, DARIUS HOLMES, DANIEL L. CONN and others
TRIPATI v. HALE et al
as 2:2013cv00830
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
MARK W. HALE, DARIUS HOLMES, DANIEL L. CONN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
