Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Darling v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2010cv15082
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Richard E Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Darling v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2010cv15082
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Richard E Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv00860
Plaintiff:
Darl Shook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Opiyo v. Strickler et al
as 2:2009cv13609
Plaintiff:
Frederick Opiyo
Defendant:
Virg Strickler, Garry M Biniecki, H Boehm and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Ferguson v. Van Horne
as 5:2009cv02055
Plaintiff:
Darl Ferguson and Darl Ferguson
Defendant:
E.Leroy Van Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darling v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01191
Plaintiff:
Robert Darling
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Honeywell Aerospace Services and Honeywell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Electrical Workers Local 252 Apprentice School Fund et al v. JT Truth LLC et al
as 2:2008cv14917
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers Local 252 Apprentice School Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 252 Joint Apprentice Training Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 252 Labor Management Cooperation Fund and others
Defendant:
JT Truth LLC and John R Darling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184 Violation Collection Bargain Agreement
USA v. Tevaughn Darling
as 08-4018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TEVAUGHN E. DARLING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferguson v. Van Horne
as 5:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
Darl Ferguson
Defendant:
E. Leroy Van Horne and E. Leroy Van Horne
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
