Cases filed in Indiana
Darling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00292
Plaintiff: RICK L. DARLING
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SIMS v. WEXFORD/N.C.P. TREATMENT CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00585
Defendant: BOUILLON, VICKI E. BURDINE, HIAMEN and others
Plaintiff: JOHN SIMS and JOHN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00016
Defendant: MELLANDER, DAVIS, CHARLES FAENZA and others
Plaintiff: LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hendrix et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00752
Defendant: Ms Smith, John Salyer, Ms Stevens and others
Plaintiff: Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. KERIS et al
as 1:2018cv01838
Defendant: DOUGLAS R. BITNER, DARLING, MARY K. HEIMAN and others
Plaintiff: LANCE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Darling Ingredients Inc.
as 2:2017cv00351
Plaintiff: Brian Pittman
Defendant: Darling Ingredients Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2016cv03396
Defendant: CHRISTINA ANDERSON, ROBERT ANDREWS, BOBBIE ANTHIS and others
Plaintiff: EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
ESTATE OF TAMMY PEREZ v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00645
Defendant: ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., CHRISTINA ANDERSON, ROBERT ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF TAMMY PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00783
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?