Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Cockfield v. Kinney et al
as 4:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
Davion Cockfield
Defendant:
Caroline Kinney, Neal Cusack, Tony Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Avin v. Darlington County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2021cv00651
Defendant:
T. Dop., T.N. Department of Probation and Parole, Darlington County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Donavan Avin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gainey et al v. Corbett et al
as 4:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Sumter County, Darlington County, Darlington County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gainey and Michael Gainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin v. Darlington County Sheriff's Office, The et al
as 4:2018cv02894
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff John Spect, Sheriff Toney Chavis and Darlington County Sheriff's Office, The
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Benjamin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Duke Energy Inc et al
as 4:2013cv01456
Defendant:
Duke Energy Inc , JW Byrd , Joyce C Everett and others
Plaintiff:
William B Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Sly et al
as 6:2012cv02998
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
James Sly, Assistant Warden Nolan, Warden McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ham v. Darlington County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
Darlington County Sheriffs Office, Calvin Jackson, Tim Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
