Cases 1 - 10 of 29
HUGHES v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00538
Petitioner:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv02122
Plaintiff:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Hughes v. USA, et al
as 14-5225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darrell Wayne Hughes
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and Barack Hussein Obama
HUGHES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01447
Plaintiff:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Defendant:
MICHAEL PENCE and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. LEVENHAGEN
as 1:2013cv01732
Petitioner:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Respondent:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darrell Hughes v. Suprt Westville Corrtl Facil, et al
as 13-40982
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
HUGHES v. LEVENHAGEN
as 1:2013cv01095
Petitioner:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Respondent:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00960
Plaintiff:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
