Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Darryl Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corr, et al
as 13-12350
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Darryl Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-10505
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01247
Petitioner:
Darryl Lewis Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01248
Petitioner:
Darryl Lewis Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2012cv00165
Petitioner:
Darryl Lewis Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. TUCKER
as 3:2012cv00044
Petitioner:
DARRYL LEWIS DAVIS
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Bornstein
as 11-931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darryl Lewis, AKA Darryl Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert E. Bornstein, FBI, SA, I/O and Nestor Caraballo, TF Detective, I/O
Lewis v. Woosley et al
as 4:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lewis
Defendant:
Jason Woosley and Timothy Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Woosley et al
as 4:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lewis
Defendant:
Jason Woosley and Timothy Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Frost v. Mike Mahoney, et al
as 10-35630
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL LEWIS FROST
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE MAHONEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
