Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,598
Gross et al v. Dodson et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff: Laslo Gross and Susan L. Gross
Defendant: Nick Dodson, Mike Dodson, David Claassen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2024cv00252
Petitioner: DAVID FRANCIS CLARK
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00248
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner: Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent: Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: David Knight
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
BROWNING v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff: PIERRE BROWNING
Defendant: MECKLENBURG COUNTY and DAVID LANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff: JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant: OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03058
Plaintiff: Keith Cureton
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant, Lower Bed Unit Restrictive Housing Officers, Ms. Sergeant Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: William David Christian, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?