Cases 1 - 10 of 39,029
Minter v. Brightwater R&B Acquisition LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Jacob Minter
Defendant:
Brightwater R&B Acquisition LLC doing business as R&B Machine, Mark Williams and David Sosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Knott v. The City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Eva Knott
Defendant:
The City of San Diego, Police Chief David Nisleit and Lieutenant Adam Sharki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Lettieri v. Four in One
as 4:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Four in One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District v. Imperial Valley Healthcare District et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District
Defendant:
Robert Amparano
Respondent:
Imperial Valley Healthcare District, Enola Berker, Katherine Burnworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Loeffler v. Ravalli County et al
as 9:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dan Robert Loeffler
Defendant:
Ravalli County, Jarin Gassett, Keenan Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Oppenheimer v. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02918
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
