Cases 1 - 10 of 133
United States of America v. Cohen
as 24-1541
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID ALAN COHEN
David Mark Cohen v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06492
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Mark Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
REINIG et al v. RBS CITIZENS, N.A.
as 2:2015cv01541
Special Master:
DAVID R. COHEN
Plaintiff:
ALEX REINIG, KEN GRITZ, BOB SODA and others
Defendant:
RBS CITIZENS, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In re Lordstown Motors Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00604
Nominal Defendant:
Lordstown Motors Corp.
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Cohen, David M. Cohen, Herbert Stotler and others
Defendant:
Keith A. Feldman, Martin J. Rucidlo, David T. Hamamoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
