Cases 11 - 20 of 40
JONES v. MELLINGER et al
as 1:2020cv02908
Defendant:
LEE, SARA ABSENGER, SANDY FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CRANE et al
as 1:2020cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
ROBERT CRANE, ANTHONY LAWRENCE, MADISON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. David Jones
as 20-1146
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID P. JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raffel Systems LLC v. Man Wah Holdings LTD Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01765
Defendant:
Man Wah Holdings LTD., Inc., Man Wah Holdings LTD Inc, XYZ Companies 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Raffel Systems LLC
Special Master:
David E Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Griffin v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv01241
Respondent:
Mario Gonzales and Magistrate Judge David E Jones
Petitioner:
Gabriel Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Jones v. Dushan Zatecky
as 17-2606
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID M. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
Michael Sheneman v. David Jones, et al
as 17-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHENEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID P. JONES, NEWBY LEWIS KAMINSK JONES LLP, BARBARA Z. BROOK, AUSA, in her official and personal capacities and others
JONES v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2017cv00257
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, DANKIN, DENNIS DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. ZETECKY, ET AL
as 1:2016cv03347
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON, LT. K. SAMONE, VINCENT STANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
R. Wayne Johnson v. David E. Jone
as 16-3844
Petitioner:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Respondent:
DAVID E. JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
