Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones v. Radovsky
as 4:2022cv01800
Petitioner:
David Emanul Jones
Respondent:
Warden Radovsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP v. Boucher & James Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04596
Plaintiff:
CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP
Defendant:
Boucher & James Inc., Ross Boucher, DAVID R. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MULHERN v. FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD et al
as 2:2019cv00671
Defendant:
RIVINDRA DEO, MICHAEL KENNEDY, RON MCCRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL MULHERN
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8470
WARREN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., CARL A. HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IKOR USA, INC. v. CIMARRON ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05966
Plaintiff:
IKOR USA, INC.
Defendant:
CIMARRON ASSOCIATES, LLC, MELINDA LEGLER JONES, DAVID M. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31779
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55162
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv01333
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32651
Plaintiff:
DAVID L.J. JONES
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
