Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Moreland v. Bank of New York Mellon (The), et al
as 15-13417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEON MORELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (THE), f/k/a The Bank of NY, successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, na successor to Chase Manhattan Bank, successor to Chemical Bank, as Trustee for IMC Home Loan Equity Trustee 1998-1 by Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., RICHARD B. MANER, P.C., Attorney at Law and JPMORGAN CHASE MORGAN BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
David Moreland v. Hon. Lisa Wood, et al
as 15-12326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEON MORELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
GARRET MEADER, The Law Firm of Brown, Readdick, Bumgartner, Carter, Strickland & Watkins, TERRI READDICK, Attorney at Law, MICHEAL FAIRMAN, Glynn Iron & Metal Inc., and others
Moreland v. Wood et al
as 2:2014cv00143
Plaintiff:
David L. Moreland
Defendant:
Lisa Godbey Wood, James E. Graham, Lois Tonstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreland v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 2:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
David L. Moreland
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and Richard B. Maner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manugraph Americas, Inc. v. Moreland et al
as 1:2013cv00841
Plaintiff:
Manugraph Americas, Inc.
Defendant:
David A. Moreland and Dauphin Graphic Machines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
David Moreland v. T. Felker
as 12-55768
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID W. MORELAND
Respondent - Appellee:
T. FELKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-10019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David W. Moreland v. T. Felker
as 2:2009cv00977
Petitioner:
David W. Moreland
Respondent:
T. Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
