Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Wright v. Richardson, et al.
as 2:2024cv11121
Defendant:
Deshon Anderson, Cedric Lamar Richardson, Dawn Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Court Clerk's Office, Central Records Division (Metro Police Department) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bleau v. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
David Allen Bleau
Defendant:
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, Inc. and Kyle Connolly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Clerk's Office, Metro Impound Lot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thackston v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlon Thackston
Defendant:
Eric Scott Mauldin, David Allen Doyle and Dee Gayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 1:2023cv01803
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 2:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fabricant v. David Allen Capital, Inc.
as 2:2023cv11111
Plaintiff:
Terry Fabricant
Defendant:
David Allen Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00807
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. David Allen
as 22-1698
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
