Cases 11 - 20 of 323
Najacque v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00835
Petitioner:
Leonard Wista Najacque
Defendant:
David Anderson, II
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant:
Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
David Anderson and Karen Anderson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc., TPG, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Custis v. Anderson
as 2:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
Ryricka Nikita Custis
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askari Lumumba v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASKARI DANSO MS LUMUMBA
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, JOSEPH WALTERS, DAVID ANDERSON and others
Wood v. Phelps et al
as 7:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Jameson James Wood
Defendant:
Phelps, David Anderson and Lisa Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Anderson
as 23-50837
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan David Anderson
USA v. Anderson
as 23-50834
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan David Anderson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
