Cases 31 - 37 of 37
David Boland Inc v. Bond Safeguard Ins
as 5:2003cv00417
Plaintiff:
David Boland Inc
Defendant:
Bond Safeguard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Viron Int'l Corp. v. David Boland, Inc., et al
as 6:2002cv00836
Plaintiff:
Viron International Corporation
Defendant:
David Boland, Inc., Harden Enterprises, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Counter Defendant:
Peerless Insurance Company
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
B & H Asphalt Paving v. David Boland Inc, et al
as 5:2002cv00031
Plaintiff:
B & H Asphalt Paving Inc
Defendant:
David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
ACME Indus Piping, et al v. David Boland Inc, et al
as 2:2002cv00720
Plaintiff:
ACME Industrial Piping Inc
Defendant:
David Boland Inc and Travelers Casualty and Surety Co of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Surety Company of America
Counter Claimant:
Bechtel Savannah River Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270
Custom Concrete Inc v. David Boland Inc, et al
as 5:2002cv00209
Plaintiff:
Custom Concrete Inc
Defendant:
David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Kirby Specialties v. David Boland Inc, et al
as 5:2000cv00220
Plaintiff:
Kirby Specialties Corporation
Defendant:
David Boland Inc and American Insurance Company
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
David Boland, Inc., et al v. Oppenheimerfunds, et al
as 6:2001cv00018
Plaintiff:
David Boland, Inc., David Boland, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, Donna Brockelmeyer and others
Defendant:
Oppenheimerfunds, Inc and California Pension Adminstrators & Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
