Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hjalmar Rodriguez v. Edward Burnside
as 20-11218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ and HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD H. BURNSIDE, MARY GORE, Nurse,GDCP, DAVID BUTTS, Medical Director, GDCP and others
RODRIGUEZ v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, BRUCE CHATMAN, CELLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owenby v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv04381
Plaintiff:
James David Owenby
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison, Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOBSON v. FOWLKES et al
as 5:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOBSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH FOWLKES, DAVID BUTTS and SHEVONDAH FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chad Bubrick v. Hays SP Warden, et al
as 12-12852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD M BUBRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HAYS SP WARDEN, CARL LIFT, DAVID BUTTS and others
Chad Bubrick v. Hancock SP Warden, et al
as 11-11345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD M BUBRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HANCOCK SP WARDEN, CARL LIFT, DAVID BUTTS and others
Arnold v. Adams et al
as 5:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Rashad Arnold
Defendant:
Alan Adams, David Larry Fraizier, Fred Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bubrick v. Frazier et al
as 5:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Chad M Bubrick
Defendant:
David Frazier, Carl Lift and David Butts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Toney v. Butts et al
as 5:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
David Ray Toney
Defendant:
David Butts, James E. Donald, Annette Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
