Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kenzo Quezergue v. Bret Gunn, et al
as 22-5432
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENZO QUEZERGUE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET T. GUNN, in his individual capacity, former Assistant District Attorney, JUDGE CHERYL BLACKBURN, in her individual and official capacity, VICTOR S. JOHNSON, III, in his individual capacity, former District Attorney General and others
Quezergue v. Gunn et al
as 3:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kenzo Quezergue
Defendant:
Bret T. Gunn, Judge Cheryl Blackburn, Victor S. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Robert Rolston, et al v. TN, et al
as 19-6309
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM J. FAIMON, PATTI MCNANEY, ROSEMARY DUCKLO SEXTON, District Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ROLSTON and CATHERINE R. DUNLAP-ROLSTON
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE GOVERNMENT
Dotson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne Carpenter, Jerry Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2014mc00252
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Wayne Carpenter, Jerry Lester and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-6447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fournerat v. Warden of Davidson County Detention Center et al
as 3:2008cv01172
Plaintiff:
Wayne M. Fournerat
Defendant:
Warden of Davidson County Detention Center and David C. Torrence
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00959
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
